County to Respond to Report Citing Deficiencies in Public Guardian's Office

Riverside County supervisors voted 5-0 to receive and file the 19-member civil grand jury's report on the Public Guardian's Office and have the Executive Office address the jury's findings by March 11.

The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday directed staff to respond to a grand jury report that found Riverside County workers who manage the affairs of elderly and developmentally disabled residents are overburdened and operating under dated guidelines.

The board, without comment, voted 5-0 to receive and file the 19-member civil grand jury's report on the Public Guardian's Office and have the Executive Office address the jury's findings by March 11.

The grand jury completed an inquiry last fall that included interviews, an analysis of policies and procedures and inspections of numerous records in the Public Guardian's Office, a branch of the Department of Mental Health with a $1.5 million annual budget.

Public guardian "deputies" are often appointed to act as conservators for indigent residents without close family to support them. The report indicated that clients are mostly comprised of physically incapacitated seniors, but also include mentally ill or disabled adults and others with health vulnerabilities and no means to help themselves.

The office has 10 case workers, or deputies, three supervisors and a clerical staff of five, according to the grand jury.

Jurors noted that deputies are routinely called to investigate reports of abuse and to find suitable living arrangements for clients who have no assets and are dependent on Medicare or Medi-Cal.

The grand jury said it learned public guardian deputies carry caseloads as high as 196 conservatees.

"Sworn testimony indicated that caseloads are unmanageable," the report stated. "It was revealed that there were tasks that additional clerical personnel could do that would free up the deputies, (who) said that they must prioritize tasks, according to importance, and that consequently some tasks are left undone or are delayed."

Jurors found that deputies are operating under policies and procedures that haven't been updated in 25 years. The office's policy manual did not contain an index that would "facilitate" finding topics at a glance, and was missing some probate and penal code amendments that have become law since 1988.

Public guardian staff complained of having to use antiquated office equipment and told jurors that their last staff meeting was conducted in April.

The grand jury issued the following recommendations:

-- have a limitation on the number of caseloads to ensure a more efficient operation;

-- update the policy manual to "reflect current practices," with an index to enable quick referencing of information;

-- permit the hiring of more clerical workers;

-- secure additional funding to expand the number of deputies on staff

-- obtain "scanners, printers, headphones and ergonomic furniture" for the benefit of employees; and

-- hold monthly staff meetings.

—City News Service
Sara Harvey February 07, 2014 at 07:03 AM
I see nothing here for recommendations for the life and quality of their "wards" the elderly and developmentally disabled residents. 196 should be unlawful. There should be a fine and an investigation to actually warrant if some of their "wards" actually need to have a public guardian rather than having family appointed.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »