.
Feedback

UPDATE: County to Require Permits for Sales of Homemade Foods

The Board of Supervisors will hold their first hearing today on regulating home-based chefs.

1/8 UPDATE: A public hearing will be held three weeks from today on a proposed ordinance to regulate home-based chefs who sell their goods to the public, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors decided today.

The board accepted, without comment, the initial draft of the ordinance setting parameters for so-called "cottage food" operations. Anyone who wishes to comment on the proposal will be welcome to during the supervisors' Jan. 29 meeting.

Cottage foods were placed on the state's list of public health concerns with the passage of Assembly Bill 1616, which Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law in September. The statute mandates that counties establish standards for cottage food makers and require them to obtain permits.

Cottage foods generally include custards, meat fillings, candies, dried fruits, cereals, herbs, nuts, roasted coffees, dried teas and baked goods without cream, according to the county's Department of Environmental Health.

The agency drew up a proposed ordinance defining two classes of cottage food operators. Class "A" describes a home-based cook who engages in sales to an established clientele or at events, such as a temporary booth at a sports venue.

Class "B" describes as an operator who sells indirectly or directly to a "third-party retail food facility," according to environmental health documents.

County officials said that, under the ordinance, a class A operator would be exempt from inspections unless there are consumer complaints about products. However, class B operators would be subject to an initial inspection of their preparation areas -- kitchens -- as well as annual inspections.

Class A permits would cost $72.50 each; class B certificates would cost $290. Permits would have to be renewed annually.

All cottage food makers would be required to meet minimum basic food handling standards defined in the California Health and Safety Code. Regulations include keeping utensils and surfaces clean; keeping children or potentially contagious people out of the preparation area; frequent hand- washing and no smoking.

All operators would need to complete a food processor course within three months of registering with the county.

According to officials, cottage foods must be properly labeled, using the words "Made in a Home Kitchen" or other such language to be in compliance with the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Permit-holders who commit violations could face fines ranging from $100 to $500.

AB 1616 prohibits counties or cities from outlawing cottage food operations. Instead, the law stipulates that local governments must implement regulations related to zoning and food handling permits.

1/8 ORIGINAL POST: Riverside County supervisors will hold their first hearing today on a proposed ordinance regulating home-based chefs who sell their goods to the public.

So-called "cottage food" operations were placed on the state's list of public health concerns with the passage of Assembly Bill 1616, which Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law in September. The statute mandates that counties establish standards for cottage food makers and require them to obtain permits.

Cottage foods generally include custards, meat fillings, candies, dried fruits, cereals, herbs, nuts, roasted coffees, dried teas, and baked goods without cream, according to the county's Department of Environmental Health.

The agency drew up a proposed ordinance defining two classes of cottage food operators. Class "A" describes a home-based cook who engages in sales to an established clientele or at events, such as a temporary booth at a sports venue.

Class "B" describes as an operator who sells indirectly or directly to a "third-party retail food facility," according to environmental health documents.

County officials said that, under the ordinance, a class A operator would be exempt from inspections unless there are consumer complaints about products. However, class B operators would be subject to an initial inspection of their preparation areas -- kitchens -- as well as annual inspections.

Class A permits would cost $72.50 each; class B certificates would cost $290. Permits would have to be renewed annually.

All cottage food makers would be required to meet minimum basic food handling standards defined in the California Health and Safety Code. Regulations include keeping utensils and surfaces clean; keeping children or potentially contagious people out of the preparation area; frequent hand- washing and no smoking.

All operators would need to complete a food processor course within three months of registering with the county.

According to officials, cottage foods must be properly labeled, using the words "Made in a Home Kitchen" or other such language to be in compliance with the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Permit-holders who commit violations could face fines ranging from $100 to $500.

AB 1616 prohibits counties or cities from outlawing cottage food operations. Instead, the law stipulates that local governments must implement regulations related to zoning and food handling permits.

If the Board of Supervisors approves the structure and provisions of the proposed ordinance, a public hearing will be scheduled in two weeks to hear any comments on the measure, after which a final vote will be taken.

-City News Service

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Murrieta Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
sandalina May 21, 2013 at 02:05 pm
This couldn't possibly happen in a worse place, given the proximity to the freeway, high school, andRead More numerous businesses. UGH! The following is the press release from MPD: On 05-21-13, at 3:27 AM, the Murrieta Police Department received a call of a water-main break in the area of California Oaks Road and Monroe Avenue. Murrieta Police and Murrieta Fire Department initially responded to the scene and discovered a large sinkhole in the westbound lanes of California Oaks Road just west of Jackson Avenue. The sinkhole was approximately 4 feet deep and about 20 feet across. The hydraulic pressure from the water-main break appears to have created this sinkhole and damaged all the westbound lanes of California Oaks from approximately Jackson to Monroe. As a result, the westbound lanes of California Oaks between Jackson and Monroe will be closed for repair until further notice. Rancho Water Officials estimate that these repairs will take approximately one week to complete. When traveling in this area please expect delays and plan an alternate route in order to arrive at your destination on time.
John Kirk De Ritis May 21, 2013 at 08:39 am
I called Rancho was told 3/4 hours from now water will be back up
John Kirk De Ritis May 21, 2013 at 08:39 am
Why hasn't anyone said anything about this my water died literally at 4 am the entire street has noRead More water
Dave Peters May 19, 2013 at 02:44 pm
Hey Maggie, I don't get a chance to talk to the help desk but the ad has gone away for now. I justRead More made a comment on one of Carl Petersons blogs and now the comment has disappeared and no trace of it in my comment history. Are comments still pending proof reading before they post? Was it taken down by the blog author? I realize you guys have made a lot of changes so I'm still not sure if there are bugs being worked out or if some thing else is going on. Any help would be appreciated.
Maggie Avants (Editor) May 18, 2013 at 12:56 am
Hi Dave, I don't see that on my laptop, but it must be annoying on the iPad. I suggest emailingRead More support@patch.com. We also have a feedback form: http://feedback.aol.com/product/patch/?tid=446&r=http%3A%2F%2Fmurrieta.patch.com%2F&ch=
Maggie Avants (Editor) May 18, 2013 at 12:53 am
Hi Heather, I'm glad you like! The design team has been working hard on this for so long. There areRead More still more features coming. :)
Philip rivers May 12, 2013 at 07:45 pm
It's actually UPPER COPPER CANYON PARK
Philip rivers May 12, 2013 at 07:06 pm
Wrong! It's copper canyon park! Yay for me!
Nancy May 12, 2013 at 12:07 pm
I'm going to guess...Mapleton Park?