.
Feedback

Complaint Against Red-Light Camera Lawsuit Shot Down

The complaint filed with the Fair Political Practices Commission alleged the backers of a lawsuit against the Murrieta red-light camera initiative should be required to file political financial disclosures.

A complaint filed against the backers of a lawsuit that is aiming to derail the Murrieta red-light camera ballot measure was denied.

Murrieta resident Bob Kowell filed the complaint with the Fair Political Practice Commission, alleging the lawsuit's proponents should have been required to form a political action committee and file financial disclosures.

FPPC did not agree.

"Under the (Fair Political Practices) Act, a payment, in part, is made for political purposes if it is for the purpose of influencing or attempting to influence the action of the voters for or against the qualification or passage of any measure," wrote Gary S. Winuk, chief of the FPPC Enforcement Division, in a letter to Kowell.

"The FPPC has advised that payments made in connection with the pre-election legal challenge to the constitutionality or legality of a measure were not for political purposes and not reportable," the letter stated.

Kowell alleges that because the anti red-light camera group must pay legal fees and file them under their political action committee, the proponents should also be required to.

He said he was disappointed by the denial of his claim.

"Why they don't have to create a PAC is beyond me because it is political," Kowell told Patch.

The lawsuit was filed by Steve Flynn of Murrieta, who served as a Public Safety and Traffic Commissioner for the city and was instrumental in bringing the red-light cameras to the city in 2005.

"This just tells me that in the eyes of the court, they are saying this is not political," Flynn said, about the FPPC ruling. "That tells me a lot right there."

Flynn's attorney is Charles H. Bell, Jr., of Sacramento-based Bell, McAndrews and Hiltachk.

Flynn has said he does not know who is paying the attorney fees for the firm that approached him to join the suit.

the November 2012 ballot initiative seeking to remove red-light cameras from the city is not up to the voters because traffic laws are regulated at the state level.

A decision on whether the lawsuit will be accepted—which would prevent the measure from appearing on the ballot—i.

"Even if I can't get it off the ballot at least I'm bringing attention to the fact that the people were misled," Flynn said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Murrieta Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
sandalina May 21, 2013 at 02:05 pm
This couldn't possibly happen in a worse place, given the proximity to the freeway, high school, andRead More numerous businesses. UGH! The following is the press release from MPD: On 05-21-13, at 3:27 AM, the Murrieta Police Department received a call of a water-main break in the area of California Oaks Road and Monroe Avenue. Murrieta Police and Murrieta Fire Department initially responded to the scene and discovered a large sinkhole in the westbound lanes of California Oaks Road just west of Jackson Avenue. The sinkhole was approximately 4 feet deep and about 20 feet across. The hydraulic pressure from the water-main break appears to have created this sinkhole and damaged all the westbound lanes of California Oaks from approximately Jackson to Monroe. As a result, the westbound lanes of California Oaks between Jackson and Monroe will be closed for repair until further notice. Rancho Water Officials estimate that these repairs will take approximately one week to complete. When traveling in this area please expect delays and plan an alternate route in order to arrive at your destination on time.
John Kirk De Ritis May 21, 2013 at 08:39 am
I called Rancho was told 3/4 hours from now water will be back up
John Kirk De Ritis May 21, 2013 at 08:39 am
Why hasn't anyone said anything about this my water died literally at 4 am the entire street has noRead More water
Dave Peters May 19, 2013 at 02:44 pm
Hey Maggie, I don't get a chance to talk to the help desk but the ad has gone away for now. I justRead More made a comment on one of Carl Petersons blogs and now the comment has disappeared and no trace of it in my comment history. Are comments still pending proof reading before they post? Was it taken down by the blog author? I realize you guys have made a lot of changes so I'm still not sure if there are bugs being worked out or if some thing else is going on. Any help would be appreciated.
Maggie Avants (Editor) May 18, 2013 at 12:56 am
Hi Dave, I don't see that on my laptop, but it must be annoying on the iPad. I suggest emailingRead More support@patch.com. We also have a feedback form: http://feedback.aol.com/product/patch/?tid=446&r=http%3A%2F%2Fmurrieta.patch.com%2F&ch=
Maggie Avants (Editor) May 18, 2013 at 12:53 am
Hi Heather, I'm glad you like! The design team has been working hard on this for so long. There areRead More still more features coming. :)
Philip rivers May 12, 2013 at 07:45 pm
It's actually UPPER COPPER CANYON PARK
Philip rivers May 12, 2013 at 07:06 pm
Wrong! It's copper canyon park! Yay for me!
Nancy May 12, 2013 at 12:07 pm
I'm going to guess...Mapleton Park?
Philip rivers May 11, 2013 at 02:55 pm
The correct answer for today's picture is just creek side park!
Nancy May 11, 2013 at 10:48 am
As for today's answer, I believe it is Creekside Village Green park on Isaac St.
Nancy May 11, 2013 at 10:45 am
Yesterday's answer is Total Hair Peace??! Hmmm, that's funny; they sell wheels and car stereosRead More there? I don't think so...